A selection of recent media reports

The new recession lifestyle trend: quit Scotland for good
On one side of the hall, a dozen families jostle to be the next in line to inquire about a Canadian visa, while a more p...
Herald Scotland (14-Mar-2010)
Sarkozy faces heavy loss in French regional poll
French President Nicolas Sarkozy faces a regional vote on Sunday that opinion polls suggest will result in a heavy loss ...
Yahoo Uk And Ireland News (14-Mar-2010)
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Discrimination - An even-handed response at last
This country accepted laws against discrimination because they rightly put a stop to crude, cruel and unjust behaviour b...
The Mail On Sunday (13-Mar-2010)
Illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay
Lots of people seem to have been touched by the story of 31-year-old Sukhwinder Singh, who was stabbed to death in East ...
Timesonline (13-Mar-2010)
BNP 'amends' rules after decision
The British National Party began processing applications within hours of a court order banning recruitment of new member...
The Oxford Times (13-Mar-2010)
Free Churches question whether BNP should be allowed to stand in elections
The Baptist Union of Great Britain, the United Reformed Church and the Methodist Church in Britain have questioned wheth...
Ekklesia (13-Mar-2010)
The only politician with the guts to speak out about immigration: Frank Field reveals his candid opinion on the future o..
British cities are like a tinderbox awaiting a spark, warns Frank Field Surprisingly, it's not just ambitious Tory MPs ...
The Mail On Sunday (13-Mar-2010)
Griffin vs Hodge: the Battle for Barking
A former Labour stronghold has become home to one of the ugliest fights in politics. In one corner, a long-standing mini...
Guardian.co.uk (13-Mar-2010)
ASYLUM SEEKERS GET HOMES WHILE BRITONS HAVE TO WAIT
A MASSIVE £750million of tax-payers cash has been spent by the Government on housing asylum seekers in the last three y...
Daily Star (12-Mar-2010)
Court bans BNP from recruiting new members
The British National Party was today banned from recruiting new members after a court ruled its constitution was illegal...
The Independent (12-Mar-2010)
LABOUR IS ADDING INSULT TO INJURY FOR WORKING CLASSES
WITH nearly two million British citizens stuck on waiting lists for social housing nobody can deny that there is a despe...
Daily Express (12-Mar-2010)
REFUGEE ASSAULT CLAIMS 'NOT PROBED'
Asylum seekers who claimed they were assaulted by security staff hired by the Home Office did not have their complaints ...
Daily Star (12-Mar-2010)
£750M COST OF HOUSING ASYLUM SEEKERS...WHILE 1.8M BRITONS LANGUISH ON WAITING LISTS
MORE than £750million of tax­payers money has been spent on ­providing homes for asylum seekers over the past four years...
Daily Express (12-Mar-2010)
Public sector pension costs may reach £79bn a year
Pension payments to retired public servants could balloon by 200 per cent to £79bn a year in the next 50 years, accordin...
The Independent (12-Mar-2010)
URGENT 'REVIEWS' AT OLD PEOPLE'S HOME
Southwark Council has instructed social workers to make urgent reviews of people it has placed at the old folks' home wh...
Southwark News (11-Mar-2010)
Leicestershire police hunt for lorry stowaways
Organised criminal gangs which force illegal migrants to work in poor conditions for a few pounds a day could be operati...
This is Leicestershire (11-Mar-2010)
America nears 'tipping point' where babies born to minority parents outnumber whites for first time
America is reaching a tipping point when the babies born to minority parents outnumber whites for the first time. More ...
Daily Mail (11-Mar-2010)
Frosty Welcome For UK Electronic Borders Plan
Government claims over the roll-out of its new electronic border controls are 'not credible', according to opposition pa...
97.4rockfm (11-Mar-2010)
ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT LANDED A JOB IN LORDS
AN illegal immigrant worked in the Houses of Parliament for six months without any security checks, a court was told...
Daily Express (11-Mar-2010)
Gold Service traffickers exposed by The Sun
TODAY The Sun exposes a gang that offers illegal immigrants door-to-door delivery into Britain in a scam which they call...
Online Sun (10-Mar-2010)

Migration Trends 9.5

2003 Population Projections

Summary
1.The Government announced their revised population projections on the 18 th December. For migration the long-term assumption is that there will be a net increase in the population each year of 103,000 people.

2.Over the last few years the population projections have consistently underestimated the actual, officially stated levels of net migration as published each year by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The latest estimate is no exception. At 103,000 it is roughly two-thirds of the actual average levels of net migration (158,000) experienced over the last five years, according to ONS published data. The government figures take no account of failed asylum seekers who do not leave the country, nor of other illegal immigrants.

3.The projections do take account of the reduction in asylum claims experienced in 2003 but take no account of the many measures the government has taken to encourage migration - particularly the continuing massive expansion of the work permit system and the right of access of EU accession countries' citizens to the UK labour market from May 2004.

4.Migration Watch UK estimates that these measures will maintain net migration at over 150,000 into the foreseeable future and that a further 20,000 should be added to this figure to allow for the non-removal of failed asylum seekers, bringing the total to at least 170,000. This does not include any allowance for illegal immigrants.

5. Population projections based on an assumed net immigration of 103,000 people per year substantially understate the inflow as officially estimated by ONS and therefore substantially understate the level of population growth likely to be experienced by the United Kingdom , and the South-East of England in particular, in future years. They form a seriously misleading basis for considering policy on immigration and its impact on the UK , especially on the future level of housing demand.

Detail
6.Every two years the government publishes projections, produced by the Government Actuary's Department, of the future population of the United Kingdom . These projections are based on a number of assumptions regarding birth rates, mortality and net migration into the U.K.

7.The population projections are widely used for planning purposes and are of critical importance. For example the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister base their projections of housing needs on the population projections. Over a 25 year period it is officially stated that a variation of + 40,000 net migrants per annum would create the need for about 450,000 new households [1].

8.These latest 2002 based population projections use a figure of 103,000 net migration into the United Kingdom each year. This figure is made up of:

a. Net migration from International Passenger Survey (adjusted for migration to Ireland and visitor switchers):

+115,000

b.Asylum seekers:

+15,000

c.Adjustment for unattributable population change:

-27,000

d.Total net migration:

+103,000

9.The 1998-based projections assumed a long-term net annual migration of 95,000 from 2001-2 onwards.

10.The 2000-based projections revised the long-term estimate upwards to 135,000 per annum. However, following the publication of the 2001 census, this was reduced to 100,000 per annum.

11.The following graph shows the actual figures for net migration into the UK in comparison with the 1998 and interim 2001 based estimates. It can be seen that net migration has been consistently underestimated by about 50,000 a year.

12.It should be noted that the net migration and population projections shown above do not allow for illegal immigrants.

13.The new 2002-based population estimates also significantly underestimate future migration patterns for the reasons described in paragraphs 14 to 17 below.

14.The overall figure of 103,000 net migrants per year is significantly below actual net migration figures which have averaged 158,000 over the last 5 years. Although we are seeing a fall in asylum claims in 2003 we believe that this will be compensated for by the relaxation of controls over legal migration. The key policy measures put in place by the government are:

an increase in the number of work permits being issued from 30,000 in the early 1990's to an expected 175,000 in 2003 [2]
The opening up of our labour markets to the EU accession countries from May 2004. The Government's estimate for resulting migration into the UK is between 5,000 and 13,000 per annum. (We believe that this is a very conservative figure - our own estimate is at least 40,000 per annum [3].)
The changes to the working holidaymakers' scheme which has now become another route to allow full access to the UK 's labour market.
Changes to the arrangements for overseas students studying in the UK to allow those with science degrees to switch straight into work permit employment.

15.No allowance has been made for failed asylum seekers who remain in the country. The following graph compares the number of failed asylum seekers [4] with the number of asylum seekers removed. The difference between these two figures is represented by the yellow line and is a rough measure of failed asylum seekers who are staying in the UK . As can be seen this has been 20,000 or above for five of the last six years and well above 40,000 for the last 3 years.

16.Clearly, if the number of asylum claimants continues at the reduced levels being experienced in Q3, 2003 the number of failed asylum seekers who remain in the UK will also fall. However, we still estimate that the numbers will be in the order of 20,000 to 30,000 per annum[5].

17.Finally, as shown in paragraph 8, the government has subtracted 27,000 from the projection for 'unattributable population changes'. This adjustment is because the 2001 census did not tally with the 1991 census updated for births, deaths and migration - so migration data was considered to be too high and was reduced. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that it was the census itself which was flawed.

Conclusion
18. Our view therefore is that, without a significant revision of present government policies designed to increase immigration, net migration is likely to remain at or above 170,000 per annum for the foreseeable future. Our calculation is as follows:

Government Actuary's 2002 projection (unadjusted)

130,000

+ Increase attributable to work permits [6]

10,000

+ Increase attributable to EU expansion [7]

10,000

+ Failed asylum seekers not removed from the UK

20,000

Total

170,000

This is nearly two-thirds more than the official government projections released on 18.12.2003.

18 December, 2003

Notes

[1] Housing Statistics: Projections of Households in England 2021 - Office of the Deputy Prime Minister - Table G7
[2] Source: International Migration and the U.K.
[3] See Migration Watch UK research paper T - The effect of EU enlargement on migration flows at www.migrationwatchuk.co.uk
[4] Failed asylum seekers is calculated as the sum of 1) those who do not appeal against an initial refusal and 2) those whose asylum applications are refused on appeal. Figures include an allowance of 30% for dependants.
[5] Experience in the period 1997-2002 shows that about 37% of applicants are granted asylum or exceptional/discretionary leave. A further 13% of applicants are removed. The remaining 50% have their applications rejected but remain in the UK . Applications in Q3 2003 were running at an annual rate of just under 60,000 (including dependants). The lower figure of 20,000 allows for a substantially increased rate of removal.
[6] Based on an increase in work permits of 43,000 in 2003 cf. 2002 (175,000 vs 132,000). Of these it is assumed that two-thirds (29,000) are long-term and 27% (historical comparison of work permits issued and settlement four years later) will settle in the UK . These will constitute the long-term "net" migrants. This gives just under 8000 work permit holders. Adding in 30% for dependants brings the total to 10,000.
[7] We have taken an approximate mid-point of the government's figures.